More Good News and a Little Bad News on the Book Front

What a roller-coaster of a week! In addition to winning my third Book of the Year designation, I’ve had some ups and downs:

Those of you who follow me on social media, specifically Facebook, may be aware that the Historical Writer’s of America Conference that I was due to attend and teach at was canceled less than a week before the event. This made me every unhappy.

Putting everything else aside, it meant that I was not able to conduct my research for the Rose Ferron biography. However, I have not given up. I have flight credits that will pay for me to visit Rhode Island another time. The foundation is working on opening a “domestic chapel” and display of Rose’s possessions, so I hope to be able to attend the opening and blessing of that, which is estimated for late this year or early next.

BUT, I also have two more pieces of good news:

  1. The Once and Future Queen received a 4.5-star Crowned-Heart review in the June issue of InD’Tale magazine! They called it “a powerful analysis of Guinevere…[that] does not read like a regular history book.” This honor also means it is automatically nominated for the RONE Awards next year.
  2. Mistress of Legend is done! It still needs to be edited, proofread and laid out in book format, but it is finished at 97,000 words. (That is significantly shorter than Camelot’s Queen, but slightly longer than Daughter of Destiny.) There is nothing sweeter to a writer (other than perhaps holding a finished copy of a book in your hands for the first time) than typing those two precious little words: THE END. I was really surprised and pleased by some of the twists and turns it took, and I think you will be too. September 15 can’t get here soon enough!

Meet Marie Rose Ferron, America’s First Stigmatist

My favorite photo of Rose. If I use one on the book cover, this likely will be it.

If you’ve been following this blog in the last few months, you may remember me mentioning that I’m writing a biography of Marie Rose Ferron, a little-known Catholic mystic who, though born in Canada, lived most of her life in Woonsocket, Rhode Island. In fact, I’m going to be visiting the foundation promoting her cause for canonization in June, including viewing their archives, visiting her grave and interviewing experts about her.

I mention her today because in the Catholic Church, someday this will be her feast day. (The date you die is considered your feast day when you become a saint. May 11 is the 82nd anniversary of her death. May 24 would have been her 116 birthday.)

The first documented case of stigmata – a holy person bearing wounds of Christ in their bodies – in the United States was Marie Rose Ferron, known by many as “Little Rose.” She was born on May 24, 1902, in St. Germain de Grantham in Quebec, Canada, into a pious Catholic family who moved to Fall River, Massachusetts, when Rose was three. Rose was the 10th of 15 children, all of whom were dedicated to one of the mysteries of the rosary by their mother. Prophetically, Rose was dedicated to the crucifixion of Christ.

She was a very religious child, who had occasional visions of Jesus and saints from a young age. Her family was large and poor, so at the age of 12, she left school to work as a caregiver to local children. About a year later, Rose became seriously ill and her right hand and left foot were left paralyzed. Rose also suffered from a stomach or intestinal disease that made it difficult, and then impossible, for her to digest or keep down solid food. In addition, she had tetanus, which resulted in lockjaw, and made eating nearly impossible.

By 1925, when her family moved to Woonsocket, Rhode Island, Rose was nearly bedbound. She had to be secured to her bed, which was only a board without a mattress, with strips of linen; otherwise, her body would contort and roll up like a hoop. The doctors couldn’t determine what was wrong with her, even though she was in great pain. Seeking to find meaning in her sad life, she turned to Father Gauthier, who taught her the value of redemptive suffering. This led to her offering herself up as a “victim soul” to expiate the sins of others.

The Sentinellist Affair
Around the same time, the diocese into which Rose moved was embroiled in a great controversy that would come to be known as the Sentinellist Affair. In short, Bishop Hickey was raising funds for a new school through a voluntary drive, but he warned it would be turned into a parish tax if people didn’t contribute willingly. The French Canadians of his diocese felt that they shouldn’t be taxed and that the Irish Catholic bishop was plotting to destroy their French-speaking schools and cultural identity in order to “Americanize” them by forcing them into his English-speaking schools. The difference of opinion became so great that the French Canadians took the bishop to court and he excommunicated them.

Bishop Hickey had heard of Rose and her growing reputation for sanctity and so appealed to her to offer her sufferings up to Jesus for the souls of those who were excommunicated and for the good of his diocese. She did so, and all eventually returned to the Church. This was the beginning of Rose’s saintly reputation in the community.

Rose as Mystic

A photo taken just after Rose’s death, showing the Crown of Thorns stigmata.

In addition to her physical sufferings, Rose experienced many mystical phenomenon, including ecstasy, stigmata, the ability to receive Communion without swallowing, bilocation, the ability to discern blessed objects and consecrated hosts, to tell who was a priest vs. a lay person, to read consciences, and to survive for long periods of time without eating solid food. She often took on the pains and illnesses of others, from childbirth to alcoholism, in order to spare others and benefit their souls.

At the end of 1926, Rose received the stigmata, beginning with wounds of the scourging on her arms. During Lent 1927, the marks of the hands and feet appeared. In January 1928 the stigmata of the crown of thorns (which was to become nearly permanent and very clear according to witnesses and photography) appeared and during Lent of 1929 she received the stigmata of the heart. In August of the same year she began to cry tears of blood like Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane and each Friday took on the countenance of the Holy Face. Other wounds appeared only when she suffered Christ’s passion for three hours on Fridays, such as that of the shoulder (from carrying the cross), one on her lower neck and one that bisected her forehead. Rose’s wounds would appear on late Thursday, remain until approximately 3 p.m. on Friday, and disappear completely by Saturday, as if they had never been and without a trace of infection.

Longing to live the life of a religious, but far too ill to join a convent, for many years Rose was a lay member of the Franciscans and also affiliated with the Sisters of the Most Precious Blood. On December 8, 1928, with the permission of Bishop Hickey, Rose took part in a ceremony of consecration in which she took a private vow of perpetual virginity as the first Sister of Reparation of the Sacred Wounds of Jesus. This did not make her a nun, but rather a consecrated lay person. Unfortunately, she did not live to see her order formally revived and approved in the mid-1950s and continue into the 21st century.

Victim of Reparation
By August 1931, fearful of the all the attention the stigmata brought to her and of developing pride, Rose prayed that her wounds would be removed. Jesus made all of them invisible, except for the crown of thorns. Rose still suffered from them; she felt blood rush to them and they caused her great pain, even more, she said, than when they were visible.

Around this time, rumors began to circulate that Rose’s wounds were never real and that all of her sufferings were a hoax. People began to call her a fraud and even close family friends publically turned against her. Believing these false accusations, Rose’s new spiritual director, Father Joseph Baril, told her that her spiritual life was built on a false foundation and that his task was to destroy it and rebuild it properly. So great was his zeal that even Rose began to question her own experiences and wonder if she had been deceived by an illusion.

Death of “Little Rose”

Rose’s grave in Precious Blood cemetary

Once when Rose was in ecstasy, she asked Jesus how much longer it would be before she could join him in heaven. The answer was seven more years, indicating that she would die at the age of 33. By April of 1936, just a month before her 34th birthday, it appeared Rose’s prediction was going to come true. She fainted when she tried to speak, was unable to even drink water, and the pain in her head was so great she would lose consciousness when she heard loud noises. Soon she was blind and deaf. She received last rites on May 2 and died on May 11.

Nearly 15,000 people viewed her remains and more than 4,000 people attended her funeral. In 1947, her grave was opened and her body was found to be incorrupt, a sign of sanctity often attributed to saints and other holy people in the Catholic Church.

Cause for Canonization
But Rose’s story does not end with her death. Almost immediately, friends, family, neighbors and those who had been devoted to Rose during her life began calling for a cause for canonization to be opened, which is the first step in a person becoming a saint in the Catholic Church. Led by Rose’s spiritual director, Father Boyer, a cult quickly formed around Rose. In 1941, Father Boyer published She Wears a Crown of Thorns, the first biography of Rose, and continued to actively promote Rose’s cause until his death in 1959.

To date, there have been two inquiries into Rose’s life for the purpose of deciding whether or not there is sufficient evidence to open a cause for canonization in Rome. The first was in the late 1950s and was led by Bishop Russell McVinney of Providence, Rhode Island. The second was conducted a few years later by Father William McKitchen. This one ended in 1963 with a decree against her case, rendering it effectively closed. The details of the diocese’s findings have never been made public and nor have they given any reason for the negative outcome, leaving Rose’s admirers confused and often outraged.

But that has not stopped those who believe her case has been grossly mishandled. According to Father John Baptist Palm, who worked for Rose’s cause for 50 years, the negative opinion of Rose by members of the clergy appears to stem from the testimony of four people among hundreds. In addition, according to Monsignor Arthur Geoghegan, testimonies in favor of Rose disappeared from the chancery files, and in 1951, a Father O’Brien destroyed all the papers about Rose after being told by the bishop Rose was a fraud. Later, when the second investigation was opened and Father Palm presented the 200 positive testimonies he had collected to Father William McKitchen, leader of the investigation, Father McKitchen refused to even look at them.

Spreading the Word About Rose

Purchased from Adobe Stock

In spite of the 1963 decree, various groups have kept Rose’s cause alive over the years through in-home prayer groups, pamphlets and the now defunct “Little Rose Magazine.” Devotion to Rose is particularly strong in Asia, where she is said to have appeared many times.

From the 1950s through his death in 2009, one of Rose’s strongest advocates was Father John Baptist Palm, who wrote several books regarding Rose and her cause and compiled over 2,000 pages of testimony by people who had known Rose. In 1971, he sent this information to the Holy See, as well as the bishops of North America, but with no resulting change.

In the Internet age, Rose’s supporters are finding new ways to spread the word about her and connect with one another. There is an online apostolate at and there are several lengthy articles about Rose at, in addition to numerous blog posts, social media and articles that tell her story or detail healings in her name.

In 2015, the Rose Ferron Foundation of Rhode Island was founded with the intention of preserving the contents of a chapel built by Rose Myette, Rose’s cousin and caregiver, under Rose’s guidance. But since then, the foundation has expanded into actively working for Rose’s cause for canonization.

Learn more
In case you want to learn more about Rose (and don’t want to wait for my book and/or future blog posts from me), here are some links that contain good information about her: